Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 01304
Original file (PD2013 01304.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW
NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX CASE: PD1301304
BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY BOARD DATE: 20131217
SEPARATION DATE: 20041026

SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SPC/E-4 (92Y, Supply Specialist) medically separated for chronic low back and right knee conditions. The CI had insidious onset of her back and knee pain with no reported mechanism of injury to her back or right knee. She underwent extensive physical therapy, profiling and chiropractic care with no relief. Her conditions could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of her Military Occupational Specialty or satisfy physical fitness standards. She was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The low back and right knee conditions, characterized as “chronic low back pain” and “right knee pain secondary to retropatellar pain syndrome” were forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. The MEB forwarded no other conditions to the PEB. The Informal PEB adjudicated “chronic mechanical low back pain without history of injury” and “right knee pain without history of injury” as unfitting, rated 10% and 10% with likely application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) and the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy respectively. The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.

CI CONTENTION: “Conditions have worsened. Veteran is unable to obtain employment because of conditions and proper care for dependent activities limited. Lower back pain have worsened unable to provide care for dependents because of conditions. Right knee conditions have worsened. Veteran have nightmares because of PTSD incident in military on rifle range. Veteran is always afraid of loud noises Veteran has been going to mental health in local city for counseling and medication.”
SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The ratings for the unfitting low back and right knee conditions are addressed below; and, no additional conditions are within the DoDI
6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) was not an MEB or PEB condition. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records. The Board acknowledges the CI’s information regarding the significant impairment with which her service-connected condition continues to burden her; but, must emphasize that the Disability Evaluation System has neither the role nor the authority to compensate members for anticipated future severity or potential complications of conditions resulting in medical separation. The Board’s role is confined to the review of medical records and all evidence at hand to assess the fairness of PEB rating determinations, compared to VASRD standards, based on ratable severity at the time of separation.

R A T I N G C O MP A R ISO N :

S er vic e IP E B – D at e d 20040825    V A - ( 5 M o s. P o st- S e p a r a t ion )
Drawn Shape (ignored-not implemented yet) C ondi t io n        C od e     R at in g   C ond i t ion        C od e     R at in g   E x am
B a c k P a i n        5299-5237        10%      M e c h a ni c al Low e r B a c k P ain       5237     * 10%     20050401
Drawn Shape (ignored-not implemented yet) R i gh t K n e e P ain  5099-5003        10%      R e tr o p at e llar P a in S y nd r o m e , R i gh t K n e e
N o Addi t i o n al M EB / PE B E n tri e s    O t he r x 3        20050401
Combined: 20%    Combined: 20%
D er iv ed fr o m V A R a t in g D e ci s io n (VA R D ) d at e d 20050505 ( t h e O r i g i n al V A R D d a t e d 20050106 us e d o nl y t h e S T R bu t rat e d b o th co ndi ti o n s a b o ve at 10% e a c h . Cit e d V A R D u s e d t h e C&P E x am d a t e d 20050401 p e r c h art a b o v e ) .


A N AL Y SIS S U MM A R Y :

Low Back Condition (Chronic Mechanical Low Back Pain). The CI had non-traumatic onset of lumbar spine pain beginning 3 years prior to the narrative summary (NARSUM). Her pain was described as constant and without radiation. There was no associated motor weakness, bowel/bladder or lower extremity complaints. Treatments including physical therapy, profile restrictions and chiropractic care did not provide relief. Radiographs and a magnetic resonance imaging ( MRI) e x am of th e sp i n e w e re n o rm al . The r e c o rd in d i c at e d t wo emergency department (ED) visits for back pain in July and August 2004 with narcotic pain medication and muscle relaxant prescribed. The CI was not a surgical candidate. At the VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam performed 5 months after separation, the CI reported flare-ups of back pain two times a month which were described as sharp and shooting 10/10 pain which was non-radiating. Repetitive use, standing over 30 minutes, or walking more than a mile aggravates the back condition.
The goniometric range-of-motion (ROM) evaluations in evidence which the Board weighed in arriving at its rating recommendation, with documentation of additional ratable criteria, are summarized in the chart below.


Thoracolumbar ROM (Degrees)
NARSUM ~4 Mo. Pre-Sep
VA C&P ~5 Mo. Post-Sep
Flexion (90 Normal)


“Full active ROM”		 90 (pain at 60)
Extension (30) 30 (pain at 25)
R Lat Flexion (30) 30
L Lat Flexion (30) 30
R Rotation (30) -
L Rotation (30) -
Combined (240) -

Comment		 Tenderness to palpation; normal gait, motor/sensory/reflexes normal No change after repetitive use; Normal gait, sensory and motor exams.
§4.71a Rating 10% 10%

The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. There were no documented residuals and no pathology to support a diagnosis of intervertebral disc syndrome. The two ED visits might be considered episodes of incapacitation (a period of acute signs and symptoms due to intervertebral disc syndrome that requires bed rest prescribed by a physician and treatment by a physician) related to the low back condition, but were less than a week in duration and would not warrant analogous coding higher than 10%. The general rating formula for diseases and injuries of the spine considers the CI’s pain symptoms “with or without symptoms such as pain (whether or not it radiates), stiffness or aching in the area of the spine affected by residuals of injury or disease.” The PEB rated the condition for tenderness and the VA rated the condition for painful motion each at 10% under the criteria of code 5237. There

was no evidence of abnormal spinal contour, abnormal gait, or limited ROM sufficient to warrant a rating higher than 10% proximate to separation. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the low back condition.
Right Knee Condition. The NARSUM notes the right knee pain had an insidious onset. The pain increased with the use of stairs and standing up from a sitting position. Pain is located behind the kneecap and has no history of locking or giving way. The examiner stated “The pain rating is minimal and frequent.” MRI of the knee was normal. The MEB physical exam is summarized in the chart below. At the VA C&P exam performed 5 months after separation, the CI reported knee pain onset in March 2001 with injections into the knee use of Motrin for pain relief and prescription of a knee brace. The CI no longer uses the brace but continues use of Motrin for pain relief. The examiner also recorded the following: "Current complaints - She states that she has flare-ups of the right knee about four times a month, lasts about two weeks and has an effect on her work and activities of daily living by slowing her down. She avoids squatting while lifting. She states that the flare-ups occur after repetitive use of squatting, fast walking or climbing. She describes an intensification of pain from 4/10 to 10/10 with a combination of throbbing and pulling sensation. She reports stiffness, swelling, a feeling of instability and at times locking. There is no perceived heat or redness.”
The goniometric ROM evaluations in evidence which the Board weighed in arriving at its rating recommendation, with documentation of additional ratable criteria, are summarized in the chart below.

Right Knee ROM (Degrees) Narsum~4 Mo. Pre-Sep VA C&P ~5 Mo. Post-Sep
Flexion (140 Normal)
“Full active ROM”		 110
Extension (0 Normal) 30 (hyperextend)

Comment		 No instability; positive patellar grind and entrapment test Pain from 90-122 flexion (reduced to 110 w/repetition); no instability
§4.71a Rating 10% 10%

The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. Although the CI had complaints of instability and locking, there was no objective evidence of instability and an MRI was negative for meniscal damage for possible alternative coding. The PEB disability description indicated their 10% rating was for “pain, slight and frequent” at 10% and coded at 5099-5003. This language indicated likely application of the USAPDA pain policy. The PEB’s 10% rating was supported by the USAPDA pain policy, but was compliant with VASRD
§4.71a criteria. The VA coding of 5260 (leg, limitation of flexion) with 5014 (osteomalacia) would be closer to ideal than the PEB’s analogous coding to 5003 (arthritis, degenerative [hypertrophic or osteoarthritis]); however, both apply the same 5003 criteria and warrant a
10% rating IAW VASRD §4.59 (painful motion) and/or §4.40 (functional loss). There would be no benefit to the CI for alternate coding and analogous coding under 5003 is acceptable IAW VASRD principles. There was insufficient evidence in the record to justify a rating higher than
10% for the knee condition. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the right knee condition.

BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. As discussed above, PEB

reliance on the USAPDA pain policy for rating the knee was likely operant in this case and the condition was adjudicated independently of that by the Board. In the matter of the unfitting low back and right knee conditions and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudications. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.

R E C O MM E N D A T IO N : T h e B o ar d , t he r e fo r e , r e c o mme nd s th a t th er e b e n o r e c h ara c te r i z a t i o n o f th e C I’s d isa b i li t y a n d s e p ara t i o n d e te rm i n a t i on , a s fo llo w s:

UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING
Chronic Mechanical Low Back Pain 5299-5237 10%
Right Knee Pain 5099-5003 10%
COMBINED 20%


Th e fo llo w i n g do c u m e nt ary e vi d e n c e w as c on s i d e re d :

E x h i b it A. D D F o rm 2 9 4 , d a t e d 2 01 3 09 0 6 , w / a t c h s
E x h i b it B . Servi c e T r e a t me n t R e c o rd
E x h i b it C . D e p a r t m e n t o f V e te r a n s’ A ff airs T r e a t m e n t R e c o rd






XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
P r e si d e n t
Ph y si c al D is a b ili t y B o a rd o f R e vi e w


SFMR-RB                                                                         

MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557

SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20140007238 (PD201301304)
I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation and hereby deny the individual’s application.
This decision is final. The individual concerned, counsel (if any), and any Members of Congress who have shown interest in this application have been notified of this decision by mail.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:
Encl                                                  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                                      Deputy Assistant Secretary
(Army Review Boards)

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 00812

    Original file (PD2012 00812.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB combined the bilateral knee condition as a single unfitting condition, coded analogouslyto5003andratedat10%. TheBoard mustapplyseparate codes andratingsinits recommendations if compensable ratings for each condition are achieved IAW applicable VASRDsections. TheBoardnotedtheclinicexaminationof2007,5 years after separation, recorded full ROM bilaterally, a normal gait and no evidence of instability.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01636

    Original file (PD2012 01636.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ” The exam was otherwise silent regarding lumbar spine ROM, tenderness or spasm.X-rays of the lumbar spine were reportedly normal except for the L4-5 disc fusion.The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence.The PEB and VA applied the same analogous 5295 code (lumbosacral strain), but assigned different ratings for the condition at the time of placement on the TDRL. The PEB elected to use the old spine standards for the permanent adjudication, but IAW...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01419

    Original file (PD-2013-01419.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pre-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Pain (Right Shoulder) w/Posterior Instability 5099-500310%Right Shoulder Posterior Instability s/p Reconstructive Surgery 520220%20040217Chronic LBP5299-523710%LBP5237Not Service Connected (NSC)20040217Other x 0Other x0 Combined: 20%Rating: 20%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20040518 (most proximate to date of separation [DOS]) ANALYSIS SUMMARY :IAW DoDI 6040.44, the Board’s authority is limited to making...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01871

    Original file (PD-2014-01871.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The MEB also identified and forwarded two other conditions (bilateral sensorineural hearing loss and bilateral knee pain), both meeting retention standards for PEB adjudication. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. bilateral SLR; Repetitive motion...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01533

    Original file (PD-2013-01533.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Informal PEB adjudicated “TBI with residual neck pain and headaches;” “low back pain (LBP);” and “left knee pain with degenerative joint disease (DJD),” as unfitting, rated at 10%, 10%, and 0% respectively, with application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The Board could not find evidence in the commander’s statement or elsewhere in the treatment record that documented any significant interference of the neck pain condition with the performance of...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00747

    Original file (PD-2014-00747.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVeterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The VA rated the condition analogously to code 5242 at 10%, citing the range-of-motion (ROM) measurements done at the C&P examination.The limitation of motion at the MEB examination supported the 20% rating adjudicated...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 00953

    Original file (PD 2012 00953.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The PEB adjudicated bilateral anterior knee pain syndrome as unfitting, rated 0% with likely application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy and recurrent stress fracture of right tibia as unfitting, rated 0% with application of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The MEB examiner referred to the exam results documented on the MEB DD Form 2808 which are summarized in the chart above.The VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam approximately 8 days prior...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01978

    Original file (PD-2013-01978.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The Informal PEB adjudicated “bilateral anterior knee pain” as unfitting, rated 10%. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVeterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The examiner recommended an NSAID, continued use of a splint, aggressive PT and Hyalgen...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01932

    Original file (PD-2014-01932.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The low back and left knee conditions, characterized as “chronic low back pain” and “patellofemoral pain/chondromalacia patella, left knee,” were forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501.Hypertension and bunionectomy conditions were submitted by the MEB as medically acceptable.The Informal PEB adjudicated “chronic low back pain (LBP) and chronic pain of the left knee”as unfitting, rated 10% and 0% respectively, with likely application of the VA Schedule for Rating...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 01882

    Original file (PD 2014 01882.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The right knee condition, characterized by the MEB as “tricompartmental chondromalacia of the right knee,” “lateral meniscus tear” and “left knee neuroma” (Board believes this to be an error and should have been right knee), were forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW SECNAVINST 1850.4E. The Informal PEB adjudicated “tricompartmental chondromalacia of the right knee” as unfitting, rated at 10%, with likely application of theVeterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities...